Vespers notes

A few hours before the first of three concerts, here are my notes to Vespers from four years ago…

I have loved the Lutheran liturgy from childhood, even before I was aware of the concept of classical music. So I was thrilled when, during discussions with Piffaro, the idea was floated of a new composition inspired by the musical flowering of the Lutheran Reformation. That idea became this Vespers.

Because so much new music was being produced in the early 1500s for these new liturgies (including excellent music by Martin Luther himself), and since so much of it is still in use, the Renaissance hovers over Lutheran music to this day. Certainly the sounds of the instruments composed for at the time—recorders, shawms, dulcians, sackbuts, plucked strings—are as congenial to the spirit and indicative of the boldness of this music now as then.

For a Lutheran Vespers, any number of Psalms on a seasonal topic might be used. During the weeks of Epiphany (the time of the first performances of this Vespers), the Lectionary suggests Psalms emphasizing light, kingship, deliverance, and the appearance of a Savior. “Epiphany” Psalms are also used throughout the year, though, so concert performances of Vespers need not be restricted to January. For this is not a Vespers service; an actual liturgy may include many more sections than those used here. My intention was not to compose a liturgy, but to create a concert work infused with the spirit of this liturgical tradition. A “Deo gratias,” for example, would not often be as elaborate as the one here, and in any case would more properly be divided into separate “Benedicamus Domino” and “Deo gratias” sections. A Lutheran Vespers would probably include Luther’s “Komm, Heilger Geist” in place of the “Veni Sancte Spiritus” as often as not. My setting of it, which deletes all the words but the ending “Alleluia” makes this “Veni” more of an extra-liturgical Prelude. And more Psalms would most likely be included in a service.

The chorale, or Lutheran hymn, is the essence of the Lutheran musical gift to the Church. Be it a refashioned or newly composed melody for the new texts being written, the chorale tune is the musical lifeblood of Lutheranism. The hint of even a few notes immediately recalls text (and emotion) to the attentive congregant, even in purely instrumental works such as the Sonatas included here. The text is what drives Lutheran music. Typically Lutheran is the emphasis on hymns: “Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern” is used where a processional hymn might take place before the Introit, “Herr Christ, der einig Gotts Sohn” (in a setting for four, then eight, then 16 voices) is placed before the Magnificat, and Luther’s own “Vater unser,” his versification of the Lord’s Prayer in nine verses, follows the Magnificat.

This Canticle of Mary, which essentially serves as the Gospel reading, along with most non-hymn texts, would be chanted in Latin in urban churches; Luther encouraged the use of Latin where it was known, while promoting the vernacular German for hymns and in areas where Latin would not be understood. While much of the music here is chant-inspired, only two actual chants are quoted, the “Veni Sancte Spiritus” and the opening of the “Deo gratias.”

Writing for Renaissance instruments presents the same challenges as writing for their modern counterparts. Repeated listening to live performances of these instruments, singly and in ensemble, is the only way to discover the sounds and possibilities. Playing and singing music from this period in an early-music ensemble has proven to be invaluable experience for me. But I am indebted to Piffaro for providing me with a wealth of information, such as production issues within the ranges, chromatic possibilities, and so on, which would not be obvious even to the astute listener.

There is one way, though, that writing for a Renaissance band—such as might have been available to the 16th-century composer—is unlike writing for an ensemble of “modern” players. It was common practice for many musicians of the time to be proficient in more than one instrument. It exhilarates and challenges the composer to have the players of Piffaro at one’s disposal, each of whom can play any one of a variety of instruments at a world-class level. The possibilities for using these seven players and the twenty-four instruments we’ve chosen are endless. The masters excelled at varying texture (whether forces were limited, such as during the Thirty Years’ War, or not), and this is something to which I aspired.

The high standards and artistry of the professional singers of The Crossing have greatly influenced the vocal writing. Textures often shift among solo, tutti, and small ensemble singing. Modal harmonies are quite elaborate at times in the hymn settings, while there is much chant-inspired rhythmic flexibility in the Psalms, especially 27 and 113. The voice-leading in general is fairly independent, and there are large swaths of a cappella writing.

When one of the world’s premiere early-music ensembles commissions an entire evening of brand-new music, it has committed itself to an adventure into unfamiliar territory. Then again, many people love both contemporary and early music, and enjoy the experience of that which is beyond the standard repertoire. I commend Piffaro for having this vision, and thank them for allowing me to be enchanted again by the genius of the Lutheran Reformation.

Profile in the Philadelphia Inquirer

Some scattered thoughts on the interview with David Patrick Stearns in today’s Philadelphia Inquirer.

Generous remarks by him, and by Donald Nally. Very generous. Am I notoriously self-effacing? Notoriously? I mentioned the Hi-Lo’s in a Broad Street Review article on Milton Babbitt (Stearns had done his homework), and don’t you know, in the living room right next to the sofa where he sat, the LP leaning against the turntable stand, “The Hi-Lo’s and All That Jazz.” Well, Gene Puerling’s chops do make it into Vespers, but more as an approach to counterpoint than anything else. Or…?

Knowing your own influences is tricky. I hear more Praetorius, Nicolai, Lutheran in Vespers, he hears Anglican. Go figure. I sent a new photo and they used the scruffy one from the recording sessions. Ugh (self-effacing, ha), but somebody likes it, I guess. Shout-out to Mélomanie, good! Can’t wait for those concerts.

I’m no pushover? Thought I was. He liked the birds, that’s good. And it’s true, we have German names for all the wildlife: Fritz, Hunding, Steffi, Gottlob (although him I’d like to trap and release in Pennypack, enough’s enough already). I’m incredibly blessed. All around. NY press, probably won’t be any, that’ll teach me to worry.

Apparently I said the word “butt.”

Milton Babbitt

First published in the Broad Street Review, 8 Feb 2011. Slightly edited since.

I had no idea what was happening. The saxophone caterwauled ridiculously, and the piano seemed to chatter away at some other piece. I could discern no melody or beat; there was no harmony or repeating gesture to hold onto. It was chaos, and I was this close to giving up on the music. It was by Milton Babbitt.

Babbitt, who just passed away at age 94, was the hero of certain composers and the bête noire of audiences—the few that ever heard his music, that is. He pushed full-tilt intellectualism in American classical music at a time when it was clearing its throat to be taken seriously as an academic subject. For Babbitt, though, “academic” wasn’t enough. He wanted music to be a quantifiable scientific discipline, and he filled rooms with these new machines called computers to make his point. Audiences didn’t understand his music, but as he would say, who understands particle physics?

Milton Babbitt went further than Schoenberg or any of the twelve-toners. All they controlled was the order of notes. Babbitt regulated everything: pitch, dynamic, rhythm, range, you name it. Total serialism it was called, Babbitt invented it, and the academy loved it.

I kept my love of Brahms and The Delfonics to myself when working on my master’s in composition, although I needn’t have been so circumspect, as teachers understand a lot more than students realize. It’s the kids who are the most hide-bound. I still remember the look on the face of one doctoral candidate when I unguardedly confessed to him, in my 22-year-old confidence, that all one really needed to know to write choral music was the English folk songs of Vaughan Williams, and maybe Gene Puerling‘s arrangements for The Hi-Lo’s. The doctoral student didn’t betray anger, laughter, or incredulity, but I’ll never forget the look on his face. It was pity.

Well, I haven’t really changed my mind and besides, I like schemes as much as anyone. I even caught the Sudoku craze for a while until I got bored counting numbers. I wasn’t a whiz at it, mind you, I just didn’t care anymore. I actually enjoy toying with musical systems, but I never bought into the demolition of tonality that lay underneath serialism. So, I didn’t take to it, and that was that. But then a couple things happened.

I read Ulysses. James Joyce exploded the English language and I picked my way through the blast zone carefully at first, looking closely at smoking shards of phrases that resisted meaning. Some yielded only sounds and some, echoes of sounds. Some let off delayed puns and I’d think, Really? He made a joke? And I got it? That gave me courage, and I read faster, no longer worrying about the meaning. Pretty soon I had finished it, and looking back across the landscape, I felt… renewed.

Then, the Art Ensemble of Chicago came to town, and I went to see them, my first time at a live performance of avant-garde jazz. Trumpeter Lester Bowie led in his white lab coat, and Roscoe Mitchell played saxes all the way down to the contrabass, the size of a filing cabinet. Guys in face-paint and feathers and African hats played dozens of instruments. In the middle of a 20-minute free-jazz squealing cacophony, audience members were leaving, but I noticed that I had become transfixed. My eyes darted from one player to the other as they moved. I couldn’t tell much, but I could tell that they were listening to each other, and I wanted to know what would happen next. Afterward, I had to catch my breath.

So here I was, now, with this piece by Milton Babbitt. The saxophonist and pianist caterwauled and chattered, there was nothing to hold onto, and just as I was about to give up, a literally funny thing happened. The jokes of Ulysses occurred to me. Free jazz occurred to me, and feathers and hats occurred to me, and I noticed that I had stopped trying to hold on. At that precise moment I also noticed something else.

The musicians were listening to each other. They were moving. They moved the way a flock of starlings moves over a field of cut corn: one feather on one bird moves and they all move; one causes the other, but there is no cause; they follow and are simultaneous, which is impossible, or at least too fast to tell.

Like particle physics, I guess.

And as quick as that, I got Milton Babbitt. He called the piece Whirled Series (that’s right, say it out loud—Joyce would). The theory behind it, I didn’t care about. Still don’t. I don’t care about physics, either, or Sudoku, or face-paint. All I know is, I had no idea what was happening. And I wanted to know what would happen next.

Gretchaninoff in the Broad Street Review

Two years ago, just about this time, I was researching Alexander Gretchaninoff for a Fleisher Discoveries show. I found out, to my amazement, that he’s buried in New Jersey, and even more remarkable, next-door to Great Adventure. So I drove over there one Saturday to see if I could find the gravesite, did, and found myself quite moved by the experience. I didn’t know why, so I wrote up a long, meandering post about it to try and figure it out for myself. I thought it was the best thing I ever wrote.

That’s always dangerous.

I’d look at it every few months, and change a word here or there. It was especially on my mind, however, as Easter approached this year. So I looked at it again and sent it off to Broad Street Review, and with the kind attention of Dan Rottenberg’s blue pencil, and a fairly major rewrite, it became manageable enough for posting there.

Here it is.

Bruce Brubaker, PianoMorphosis

The adventurous pianist Bruce Brubaker writes about the effect of notation on the performer’s comprehension in his erudite blog PianoMorphosis. Specifically, in his post “Line break,” he looks at where publishers choose to end the staves, and whether the composer’s intentions are well-served. I think about it in my own music, as I engrave (notate, rather: I’m not an engraver, although I am persnickety) most of mine. How passages relate to page and line breaks do concern me, along with details in spacing, and page turns for parts and scores.

One sentence in his post about book typography got me thinking about parallels between music and text reading, and so I sent in a comment, below. Check out his blog when you get a chance. We have his Inner Cities CD at WRTI, by the way, and I’ve broadcast a couple of tracks of him playing John Adams and Alvin Curran on Now is the Time. He’s a wonderful and smart artist and writer!

Re: “A respect for an economy of character spaces led us to discard double spaces following periods in English prose?”

Bruce, I enjoyed this post very much. The single- or double-space after period dilemma has to do, in modern times, with the transition from typewriters to the variable-width fonts available on computers. We used to type two spaces after the period, since one space didn’t set off the sentences clearly enough on a monospace typewriter. An i taking up as much space as an m (or a period!) creates havoc with the recognition of black and white space necessary for quick reading. With variable-width fonts, just one space is fine, as the eye picks up the demarcation between sentences quite nicely (as long as we’re not using Courier).

But I’ve read old books with beautiful (variable-width) typography that do insert two spaces after the period, so it’s not just the typewriter. I’m not sure if it’s more prevalent in British as opposed to American typography (as it is with the issue of enclosing the period within a quote mark), but it certainly all has to do with the friction between two ideals: recognition and flow. Which is the same as with music notation, as you’ve said.

For my own compositions, one thing I’ve picked up from very old notation that has been almost forgotten these days is variation in beaming; that is, I like to beam notes differently to show differences in phrasing. Rather than inconsistency, it’s just another way of transmitting information to the performer. And with you, I believe that the performer picks up on it immediately, and will comprehend six 8ths beamed together in a 3/4 bar differently from the same notes beamed 2+2+2 (or even a momentary 3+3, breaking the rule by not changing to 6/8). Cheers, Kile Smith

Thrice blest

violin, viola, cello
5 minutes

Thrice blest was commissioned by David Yang, Ensemble Epomeo, and the Newburyport Chamber Music Festival and is based on “100th Psalm Tune New,” generally considered to be composed by John Tufts (1689–1750). Besides being a minister in Newbury, Massachusetts, he is important in American music because of Introduction to the Singing of Psalm-Tunes, with a Collection of Tunes in Three Parts, which he published in 1715, and in which he included this tune. The earliest extant edition dates from 1723, and “100th Psalm Tune New,” attributed to “Anon.,” is the first known music written by an American. Its popularity is signified by its many reprintings in other tunebooks until at least 1813 (it was also called “Geneva” by Andrew Law). I quote the original setting, with only a few harmonic changes, at letter E.

The text often connected to the tune, “Thrice Blest the Man,” is from 1752, by John Barnard (1681–1770), also a Massachusetts clergyman. The hymn is a versification of Psalm 1. Because the music follows the text in this composition, I’ve placed each verse in the score where it applies.

Thrice blest will be premiered on May 21st, 2010 by Ensemble Epomeo (Caroline Chin, violin, David Yang, viola, and Kenneth Woods, cello) at the Newburyport Chamber Music Festival, in Newburyport, Massachusetts.

Thrice blest the man who ne’er thinks fit
To walk as wicked men advise,
To stand in sinner’s way, nor sit
With those who God and man despise.

Whose pious soul directs his way
By sacred writ, his sweet delight,
Through all the labors of the day,
And meditates thereon by night.

As planted trees by rivers’ sides
Yield timely fruit a vast increase,
So in fresh verdure he abides
And God his handiwork will bless.

But those that spurn at sacred laws,
Shall no such favor with him find;
For God will blast them and their cause,
And whirl as chaff before the wind.

However in the Judgment Day
The wicked shall not stand the light;
Mix with the righteous shall not they,
Nor any formal hypocrite.

The Lord, who now with pleasure views,
Will then applaud the just man’s way,
But who his name and word abuse
Shall feel his wrath and melt away.

Until such time as I can post the real thing, here’s a midi version of it, with fake piano sound, which is at least tolerable, unlike fake string sound: